Forum editorial: North Dakota must enact stiffer penalties for violators of public transparency laws

North Dakota’s open meetings laws exist for a reason—government should be transparent. But when violations occur, consequences are weak. At best, officials might be asked to summarize what was discussed in secret, often months later and with little detail. Recent violations in Fargo and the Metro Flood Diversion Authority highlight the problem: laws only work when they’re enforced. Without real penalties—like civil or criminal charges for repeat offenders—leaders have little incentive to follow the rules. Public trust depends on stronger accountability.

Read Inforum’s full editorial position linked below. And if you’re wondering why this matters in Minot, we’re still awaiting the Attorney General’s opinion on whether Minot City Council violated state open meeting and transparency laws when they acted on purchasing the now-demolished Knockback Tavern property last spring. If the finding is against the city, it seems likely that the consequences will be soft.

Editorial Board

InForum

View Source