Curio |

Who decides? How algorithms and humans interact in judges’ decisions about bail

Summary
MinotVoice
MinotVoice
Source
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Lisa Camner McKay

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Keith White’s story stands at the intersection of human judgment and algorithmic prediction. Arrested in Kentucky, he faced charges that could have left him in jail simply because he couldn’t afford bail. This scenario plays out daily across the U.S.: judges must decide who waits for trial at home and who stays behind bars. Algorithms, trained on vast data, offer predictions to aid these decisions. But as economist Alex Albright notes, when combined with human discretion, these tools can shift the delicate balance of justice.

For the full story on using technology to make criminal justice more just, check out this article from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Lisa Camner McKay

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

View Source
MinotVoice

MinotVoice

MinotVoice authorship is an amalgamation of source material and local context. It is created with a human touch and an occasional AI assist. When licensing allows or content is provided as a news release, that content is also published under MinotVoice authorship and properly attributed within the article.

Comments